I am still young and still experiencing new things on daily basis, and it has been very enjoyable so far

From my own little experience, I wouldn’t say that there are negative souls, but I would say the person’s ENERGY is negative. In some cases, the soul is not ‘negative’; it’s corrupted. This case applies to serial killers, etc.

SO, there’s quite a difference between negative auric bodies and negative souls. We need to separate between the two.

Also, in the former case, their auric field has more negative energy than positive. This is due many things. Their previous actions is mostly what determines this energy as we all may know…And this is easy for a sensitive to detect.

I remember when my Empathy started to kick in, there was this particular best friend of mine who I didn’t like to be around. He always held grudge and hate inside of him, he cursed A LOT (words hold vibrations, and this also does effect his auric filed), he listened to satanic and heavy metal music, he always did negative actions, and the energy was just too much for me to handle – I was drained around him!

In closing, I think it all comes down to how ‘negative’ is defined. Different psychics will tell you different things, but I doubt they will argue over someone who DOES have negative energy.

P.S. It’s worthy to mention that negative energy and the nature of the soul are connected. IF a person develops upwards (to spirituality), their energies become of positive/light nature. But if they do the opposite and develop downwards, their energies become negative/dark nature.

I think you have a good point that people who do dreadful things are not necessarily going to be ‘negative souls’.

You know, my problem is that I don’t actually believe in negative souls so I used the example of Hitler as someone who if there is a negative soul, let’s talk about him.

I don’t believe that souls take a negative status and stay that way lifetime after lifetime. Instead, I believe that we take different roles over lifetimes. I know that some souls choose perpetrator lifetimes where they do things like rape and kill or more minor things. If we look it up, most of us (if not all of us) will have had a perpetrator lifetime or several even.

People who come up as negative souls in a SR frame of reference could be in one of those lifetimes. Or they could have lots of negativity they are immersed in right now which keeps them in victimhood. I just don’t believe they have a negative soul status that they keep lifetime after lifetime, as their permanent soul status (unless they have chosen a series of perpetrator lifetimes in a row).

I like my intuitive information to be relevant and practical and meaningful. For example, if I tell a client that they have damage in their energy field, I want to know exactly what behaviour this manifests as. And how they can overcome it. And where it originated. So if a person comes up as a negative soul, but it’s someone who’s charming, nice, otherwise not negative or engaged in behaviour that drains others, I would be asking myself – why would they come up as a negative soul? What does it mean for them? What in their life reflects it? If it’s nothing, then that sounds like useless (and potentially hurtful) information in my eyes. I believe that it is unrealistic to say that negative doesn’t mean bad. If we say that then we are out of touch with the perceptions and mindset of most people and need to serve those with very flexible mindsets who can wangle the word negative into something that is OK.

After all, it states in the course – negative souls like to manipulate to gain power. They drain others’ energy in order to get their vital life force, they create drama to siphon off a bit of energy, they play the victim. None of those behaviours are particularly positive. They are unsupporting of those around or draining for those around them. And that’s who they are on a soul level?

How can we make that into something positive? I don’t believe I can.

Kate’s blog.. Is ain’t no Melinda Gordon.

There seems to be a big confusion going on between being a “negative soul” and being a “bad person according to our moral values and judgments”. These things are completely different.

Hitler is not necessarily a negative soul. Child molesters are not necessarily negative souls. And besides, I’ve read that most of them are people who were abused themselves in their childhood. Sounds more like hurt people than like bad people to me. I have never come across one in my practice so far, as far as I know, but I have checked one rapist’s record, and he is a positive soul. Most negative souls I know are absolutely charming and nice and doing nothing morally reprehensible at all.

I don’t know… This whole discussion here leaves me perplexed and wanting to raise my eyebrows. I agree with Kate: why is it not taking place internally on the SR boards? Sounds like there’s a lot of confusion and different opinions around the concept of negative souls. Why don’t we talk about it and align our frames of reference?

Love to all.

Rosine.
Rosine Caplot´s last blog ..How to Solve the Problems in the World

Kate’s last blog.. Is Your Free Will Working For You Or Against You?

And, thank you for checking out my website. I made it using Site Build It! so it’s more of an info site than a blog at this point (sadly, *to me at least* at this stage it doesn’t have the functionality for comments)… but I digress.

I’m glad to know that you are getting a lot out of this discussion too. These are things I’ve been thinking/ wondering/ asking for higher guidance/ sometimes stressing out about for a while.

Thank you for contributing in the ways that you have and for sharing your perspective on what’s working for you
Adrianne´s last blog ..My Law of Attraction Relationship Testimonial Part Two

“Oh another thing I wanted to add, its just a pity we don’t have discussions like this on the SR forum.”

Yes, that would be (/would have been) nice. I never felt very comfortable doing it. So I am thankful for this. Even though many people reading these comments might be pretty confused. (Lol, if they get this far through *all* that we’ve written!)

“As for negative entities, Adriane, I suppose you have to call it something, negative entities is just a phrase, but really its about the delivery to clients and not scaring them but empowering them.”

Exactly Kate. It’s just the semantics of it/ parts of the specific definition of this term (and others in the course) that do not resonate with me. This part of what Anna said in her comment above describes really well how I feel about it:

“At some point probably about 18 months ago I realized there was no truth in that for me anymore – that people’s stuff was specifically ‘entities’ and I began to see the ’stuff’ as negative frequencies. So I always talk of it in terms of negative programming and patterning and frequencies and don’t talk about entities, because just explaining what an entity was is like mind clutter and doesn’t add anything.”

I feel like telling someone they have an entity attachment that is causing their negative “stuff” is disempowering if the cause is really just limiting patterns of thought and emotion that the client needs to consciously shift in their own way. Does that make sense?

Michael wrote:

“I have no problem whatsoever calling bullshit. If I’m to be excommunicated for it, it wouldn’t be the first time.”

Lol Michael, your authentic way of expressing your opinion is awesome! Even if we see things a little differently.

Slade wrote:

“I’m conscious of the fine line that exists between Critiquing What’s Wrong and Creating a Better Alternative

Amen to that! Everyone can just use whatever solutions/ alternatives work best for them and be done with it as far as I’m concerned.
Adrianne´s last blog ..My Law of Attraction Relationship Testimonial Part Two

I know that some of my comments got a bit on the ranting side which betrays the fact that this whole experience of doing ‘clean up readings’ as Slade called them, made me feel angry. I hope that it has stayed on the constructive side apart from that!